Skip to content

Engagement turns activity across OKTO into a practical pastoral signal. The goal is not to reduce people to a score; it is to help leaders notice meaningful changes early enough to respond with care.

Start with a goal

What do you want to do?

Choose the outcome that matches the work in front of you. You can come back to the deeper reference sections when you need details.

Recommended flow

A good first workflow

  1. Confirm the person belongs in the engagement-scoring population.
  2. Review the score, tier, and recent change rather than reacting to one number.
  3. Open the underlying signals and recent history for context.
  4. Choose an appropriate human follow-up when the pattern warrants attention.
Product viewOKTO
OKTO Engagement monitor

The canonical scoring population is active profiles with a membership status of Member. Visitors, inactive profiles, former members, children, and other out-of-scope records should not be mixed into the member engagement population.

Signals may come from activity such as:

  • Giving activity and recency
  • Group participation
  • Serving or volunteer activity
  • Form and next-step activity
  • Communication engagement
  • Individual attendance evidence when OKTO has a person-level signal

A sanctuary headcount by itself is not person-level attendance and should not be assigned to individual members. When individual attendance is not explicitly captured, OKTO can use other dated participation signals as evidence of connection without pretending the headcount identifies who was present.

Scores and tiers should direct attention, not make pastoral decisions. Review the underlying signals and the person’s recent history before starting follow-up.